Learn how experts demonstrate independent software development to defend against infringement claims such as copyright or trade secret misappropriation.
It’s not uncommon for different teams to create products that look or function similarly. But when a competitor alleges copyright infringement or trade secret misappropriation, the stakes rise quickly, and defendants need a clear, credible strategy to prove that their software was built independently, not copied.
At Eureka Software, we’ve been on the front lines of this challenge. As expert witnesses, we help defendants demonstrate that their software, while perhaps similar in function or appearance, was created through independent development, not unlawful copying. Our technical analysis and clear and compelling testimony can make the difference between a dismissed claim and a costly legal loss.
In this blog, we’ll explore how defendants can prove independent development, what evidence matters most, and how expert analysis strengthens the case.
Infringement claims often hinge on perceived similarities—whether in code, functionality, or user interface. But software, by its nature, often shares common patterns:
The key legal question is whether the accused software reproduces protectable elements of the plaintiff’s work, and whether any similarities arose through copying or independent creation.
Independent development is when a product is created without access to or using a competitor’s proprietary information, trade secrets, or copyrighted code. It acknowledges that two parties can arrive at similar solutions through:
Proving independent development means showing that any similarities are coincidental, dictated by the problem at hand, or arise from public domain sources, not the result of unauthorized copying.
At Eureka Software, we provide detailed, evidence-based analysis that helps defendants build a strong case. Here’s how we do it:
Our first step is to compare the source code from both parties, looking for exact matches, structural similarities, and functional overlaps. We use proprietary tools to:
If code structures and logic differ significantly, this supports an argument for independent development.
Version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, or internal repositories hold a wealth of evidence. We examine:
For example, if a feature existed in the defendant’s product before they had access to the plaintiff’s code or team members, this strongly supports an independent development claim.
Access is a key element in infringement claims. We help establish:
When we can demonstrate no access to proprietary information, it becomes much harder for the plaintiff to prove copying.
Many software features result from industry norms rather than theft. For example:
Our analysis identifies whether the disputed similarities are:
This distinction is critical in defending against infringement claims.
Sometimes, we interview developers, review design documents, and examine internal communications to understand how the software was created. We look for:
Independent development defenses hinge on detailed, credible technical evidence. At Eureka Software, we specialize in providing:
When a case depends on proving that your team built its software independently, not by copying, we’re the experts who can help you make that argument convincingly.
Similarities in software products aren’t always signs of infringement. With careful analysis and a clear understanding of industry standards, defendants can show that they developed their software fairly, independently, and legally.
If you’re facing an infringement claim or need help establishing independent development, Eureka Software is here to help. Our team combines deep technical expertise with courtroom experience to provide the clarity and evidence you need.
Contact us today to learn how we can support your legal strategy with expert software analysis and testimony.